TACITUS · policy · conflict · diplomacy · mediation
TACITUS turns fragmented documents, dialogue, claims, events, and commitments into a typed, cited, time-ordered context graph. Professionals use it to analyze policy situations, prepare briefings, mediate disputes, and give agents structure they can reason over without inventing the missing structure.
Typed graph of actors, claims, interests, commitments, events, constraints, leverage, and narratives
Source-bound provenance, temporal ordering, and explicit causal edges
Shared context for professionals and the LLM agents assisting them
TACITUS live suite
Build typed context before generation
Source-bound graph packet for analysts and agents
Actor -> Claim -> Event -> Commitment -> Constraint
Graph operation
MATCH path=(Actor)-[:ASSERTS]->(Claim)<-[:EVIDENCES]-(Source)THE BACKBONE
Dialectica is the shared memory layer underneath the suite. It turns policy and conflict material into source-bound graph context before an analyst, mediator, or LLM agent writes a sentence.
Inputs
Reports
policy briefs, field notes, diplomatic cables
Dialogue
transcripts, mediation sessions, meetings
Evidence
claims, citations, datasets
Signals
media, narratives, polarization markers
Extraction target
Convert unstructured policy and conflict material into source-bound graph context before any LLM writes a sentence.
Dialectica · context graph
The LLM receives graph-shaped context, not a wall of prose.
Actor A asserted Claim B after Event C, constrained by Rule D, with source spans attached. The model can reason with structure already built.
Tools on top
PRAXIS
Policy and analysis workspace
ARGUS
Advanced RAG over policy corpora
CONCORDIA
Live mediation intelligence
Wind Tunnel
Polarization and reception risk
Compass
Fast structured demo
Every tool can hand the same graph back to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or an internal agent as structured context.
GND
Grounded facts
CTX
Context graph
EVD
Evidence & provenance
RZN
Reasoning layer
THE PRODUCT SUITE
Dialectica creates the graph. PRAXIS, ARGUS, CONCORDIA, Wind Tunnel, and Compass turn it into workflows for analysis, RAG, mediation, simulation, and fast demos.
Policy and conflict operating workspace.
The workspace for policy, conflict, and institutional analysis. Ingest sources, build a shared graph, write briefings, and share cited knowledge products.
View productStress-test policy, messaging, and polarization risk.
Simulate how behavioral segments respond to a policy, intervention, campaign, or narrative. Find resistance, allies, and polarization risk before launch.
View productAdvanced RAG for policy and conflict corpora.
Turn reports, resolutions, transcripts, briefs, datasets, and archives into queryable, cited intelligence with graph context, grounded answers, and analyst-grade brief generation.
View productAI-assisted mediation intelligence.
Live and async mediation intelligence. Structures dialogue against the ontology, tracks commitments, surfaces contradictions, and preserves the human mediator role.
View productThe smallest demo of the engine.
Paste a dispute, policy situation, or institutional friction case. See the actors, claims, interests, commitments, and events structured in under a minute.
View productAll products are under active development. Experimental. Send feedback.
ONTOLOGY PLAYGROUND · INTERACTIVE
Pick one of three canonical samples, click Structure it, and watch Dialectica tag every primitive: actors, claims, interests, commitments, constraints, leverage, events, and narratives, with full provenance.
INPUT · dispute text
Public criticism on an internal channel, escalated to HR.
Alex publicly criticised Maya on an internal channel on May 12, asserting that Maya missed the Q2 deadline. Maya escalated to HR on May 14, filing a complaint that Alex violated the professionalism policy. Maya wants to keep her role and a written apology. Alex has said continued collaboration depends on a formal written apology. HR is bound by the grievance procedure §4.
8 PRIMITIVES
GRAPH STATS · typed output
Every node is bound to the source span it came from. Every edge is typed. Every claim is auditable back to the input.
WORK WITH TACITUS
TACITUS is building with policy teams, mediators, researchers, builders, and institutions that need better context infrastructure for complex situations.
TRY IT
Paste a dispute or policy situation and see actors, claims, interests, commitments, constraints, and events become typed structure.
Try the demoTALK TO THE FOUNDER
For institutional pilots, domain datasets, mediation workflows, API access, or product partnerships, write directly to hello@tacitus.me.
hello@tacitus.meREAD THE IDEAS
The editorial home for the thinking behind TACITUS: conflict, structure, policy, diplomacy, and the grammar of disagreement.
Visit Concordia DiscorsEvery product, page, and dataset on this site is under active development. Expect edges. Send feedback.
Read the open source