PRAXIS is built for desks, missions, mediation teams, and policy units whose reading outgrows the tools the rest of the world uses. Ingest sources, build a cited conflict graph, draft briefings and SITREPs, and hand the structure to the model — not the other way round.
Powered by DIALECTICA, our neurosymbolic knowledge-graph engine. Structured. Auditable. Contestable.
A diplomatic file, a peace process, a policy controversy — the structure already exists in someone’s head. PRAXIS is where it stops living only there.
STATECRAFT WORKFLOW
PRAXIS is designed for the moment when a desk officer, mediator, or policy team has too many documents and too little shared structure. The model does not become the authority. The graph becomes the inspection surface.
01
Cables, reports, transcripts, public statements, statutes, chats, and field notes.
02
Actors, claims, interests, constraints, leverage, commitments, events, and narratives.
03
Time-ordered, provenance-bound, typed, queryable, and contestable.
04
SITREPs, options memos, stakeholder maps, commitment ledgers, and briefing packs.
What changes
A briefing is no longer a model summary. It is a view over a cited conflict graph: every paragraph can point back to evidence, every assumption can be contested, and every commitment can be checked later.
CAPABILITIES
PRAXIS is not a chat box. It is the workbench desk officers, mediators, and analysts already have in their head — made graph-shaped and shareable.
Cited briefings, SITREPs, cables, and policy memos drafted from a structured graph. House-style templates. Provenance survives every export.
Actors, claims, interests, commitments, events, constraints, leverage, narratives — typed, time-ordered, causally linked. The reasoning surface, not a dashboard.
An assistant grounded in the graph. Every answer cites the source span. Argue with it; do not be argued at by fluent prose with no provenance.
Reports, resolutions, transcripts, briefs, archives — ingested, structured, and queryable with cited graph context. Retrieval becomes one step inside a provenance-bound workflow.
Visual actor maps and narrative-drift tracking. Interest-based negotiation, Fisher-Ury style, but as queryable graph state.
Multi-party process memory across time. Track commitments, deadlines, escalation triggers, and resolution progress. Auditable for legal, compliance, mediation.
PDF, DOCX, structured JSON, IATI / UN-style citation. Audit-grade provenance for every data point. Built for institutions that get questioned later.
No black-box conclusions. Every assertion is editable, traceable, and refutable. The model serves the analyst — not the other way round.
Hover the highlighted spans. Each is a typed primitive in the conflict graph — actor, claim, commitment, interest, event — bound to its source.
The Government of NordaliaActor announced that it would suspend all negotiationsEvent with the Democratic Reform MovementActor, citing repeated violations of the ceasefire agreementClaim. The DRM denied the allegationsClaim and stated their commitment to dialogueCommitment remains conditional on the release of political prisonersInterest.
Built for desks, missions, and mediation teams. Under active development. Send feedback.